Adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk: Evidence from a national study
What does the research say?
This groundbreaking research on adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk represents a significant advancement in our understanding of youth mental health by utilizing the first nationally representative dataset to examine this crucial relationship. The study addresses longstanding methodological limitations in previous research by including both heterosexual and sexual minority youth, allowing for proper comparison and more accurate risk assessment. By demonstrating that sexual minority youth are more than twice as likely to attempt suicide while simultaneously identifying key mediating factors like depression, substance abuse, and victimization, the research provides a solid evidence base for developing targeted prevention and intervention strategies. The findings strike an important balance between acknowledging the genuine elevated risk without overstating it, noting that the majority of sexual minority youth do not report suicidality, which helps direct resources appropriately while avoiding stigmatization and offers hope that protective factors can be strengthened through supportive educational environments and mental health services.
Why is it important?
The study addressed a critical gap by using nationally representative data to examine the link between sexual orientation and youth suicide risk. Earlier research on this topic had been limited by inadequate samples that didn’t allow for generalization. Most previous studies used convenience samples of gay and lesbian youths without heterosexual control groups, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about relative risk.
Unlike many previous studies, this research considered other critical adolescent suicide risk factors like depression, hopelessness, substance abuse, and recent suicide attempts by family members or friends. This comprehensive approach allowed the researchers to determine whether sexual orientation remained a risk factor even when accounting for these other important variables.
From a public health perspective, this research provides several important implications:
- It establishes with strong evidence that sexual minority youth face significantly higher suicide risks, confirming that targeted prevention and intervention efforts are justified and necessary.
- The findings help clarify that while the elevated risk is real, it may not be as extreme as previously suggested in some studies. This more nuanced understanding can help guide more appropriate and measured responses.
- It highlights that most sexual minority youth (84.6% of males and 71.7% of females with same-sex sexual orientation) report no suicidality at all, which provides a more balanced perspective that avoids pathologizing all LGBTQ+ youth.
- By identifying that common risk factors like depression and substance abuse are particularly elevated in sexual minority youth, the research suggests specific areas where interventions might be most effective.
This type of research is essential for developing evidence-based policies and interventions to protect vulnerable youth populations, allocating mental health resources effectively, and training professionals who work with adolescents to recognize and address these risk factors.
What are the implication for education?
Based on the research findings, educational institutions would benefit from developing comprehensive approaches to address suicide risk among sexual minority youth by creating safer school environments with explicit anti-harassment policies, providing accessible mental health resources, and training staff to recognize warning signs of depression and suicidality. Implementing inclusive curricula that positively represent LGBTQ+ individuals, establishing peer support systems like Gay-Straight Alliances, and engaging families through education about adolescent mental health are evidence-based strategies that help reduce victimization experiences, address elevated rates of depression and substance abuse among sexual minority youth, and ultimately create supportive environments where all students can thrive regardless of sexual orientation.
Read the source article
Nothing quite replaces reading the original. Here is the full article.
About the authors

Steven Russell, PhD is a Regents Professor of Child Development at the University of Texas. He is also serves as the Director of the School of Human Ecology at the UMT Department of Human Development and Family Sciences. Dr. Russel studies adolescent development, with an emphasis on LGBTQ+ health and wellbeing. Much of his research is guided by a commitment to create social change to support healthy development. His research has been used to shape local and state policies and laws for school safety. His research interests include LGBTQ youth health and rights; programs and policies to improve human development; and cultural processes in families.
In January 2025, the National Academy of Education elected Dr. Russel as an exceptional educational leader and scholar to membership in the Academy. He is also an elected board member of the National Council on Family Relations (2005-2008), President of the Society for Research on Adolescence (2012-2014), and a member of the Governing Council of the Society for Research in Child Development (2019-2025), the Boards of the Council on Contemporary Families and the New York Institute for the Humanities and Social Studies. He is also on the board of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine’s Board on Children, Youth and Families. Russell has served for many years on the Board of Directors for SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change. His outstanding trainees who work with him include an amazing group of postdoctoral scholars, graduate and undergraduate students, to whom he dedicates himself, supporting their development and learning from them, which he considers to be among the most satisfying parts of his job.